The Journal of Technology and Computer Science Prima (JUTIKOMP) implements a double-blind peer review process to ensure objective and fair evaluation. In this process, both authors’ and reviewers’ identities remain anonymous.

Reviewer Assignment

Each manuscript is evaluated by two independent reviewers from institutions different from the authors’. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field.

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:

• Relevance to the journal scope

• Originality and scientific contribution

• Methodology and data integrity

• Clarity of presentation and adherence to ethical standards

• Plagiarism check results (Turnitin or equivalent), with a maximum similarity index of 30% allowed

Decision Process

Based on reviewers’ reports, editors will notify the authors within two weeks whether the manuscript is:

• Accepted

• Requires revision

• Rejected

Reasons for Rejection

Manuscripts may be rejected due to:

• Out of scope

• Ethical violations (plagiarism, duplicate publication, data manipulation)

• Low scientific quality

• Poor formatting or language

• Two negative reviewer reports

Author Revisions

Authors are expected to carefully address reviewer comments and resubmit revised manuscripts within the following timelines:

• Minor revision: 1–2 weeks

• Major revision: 3–4 weeks

This process ensures fairness, transparency, and high scientific standards in all publications of JUTIKOMP.