Analysis of the Use of the Halo Bahasa Application PASTI Feature on Knowledge of Indonesian Language Equivalents

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Tanti Alfiana
Muh. Safar
Andi Srimularahmah

Abstract

This study was motivated by the importance of understanding Indonesian language equivalents for students in improving language literacy. Until now, students still face obstacles in finding the right equivalents due to the limited availability of easily accessible learning resources. To address this issue, this study utilizes the Halo Bahasa PASTI feature as a technology-based learning medium. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research subjects are students of SMA Negeri 14 Bone, selected based on ease of access and suitability with the research objectives. Data were collected through knowledge tests, observations, and documentation, then analyzed to describe the application implementation process, students' ability to use it, and students' knowledge of equivalent terms after using the application. The results of the study show that the implementation of the Halo Bahasa PASTI application went quite well. Most students were able to download, install, and operate the application independently, although some still needed further guidance. Students' ability to use the application was relatively good, especially in typing foreign terms, determining the search domain, and finding appropriate equivalents. From the knowledge test results, the majority of students achieved moderate to high scores, so it can be concluded that the use of the application contributed to improving students' understanding of Indonesian term equivalents.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Alfajry, B., Kurnia, D. M., & Jaja. (2022). Pemanfaatan Website Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia untuk Memperbaiki Literasi Kebahasaan Siswa. Jubah Raja: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 1(2), 73–81.
  2. Arifien, K. K. (2016). Senarai Kata Baku dan Diksi Populer. Bandung: PT Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera.
  3. Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan. (2019). Tata Istilah (Seri Penyuluhan Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Pusat Pembinaan Bahasa dan Sastra, Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan.
  4. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2024). Kebijakan Pengembangan Bahasa: Pengayaan Entri Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
  5. Daniar, M. A., Soe’oed, R., & Hefni, A. (2022). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Aplikasi Game dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa Kelas XI. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i1.332
  6. Harto, S., & Sudarto. (2024). Peningkatan Kemampuan Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Aplikasi Halo Bahasa Pada Mahasiswa Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Negeri Raden Wijaya Wonogiri. NIVEDANA : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bahasa, 4(2), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.53565/nivedana.v4i2.1035
  7. Hikmah. (2020). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Microsoft Powerpoint pada Siswa SMP Kelas VIII dalam Pembelajaran Koordinat Kartesius. 2(1), 8–15.
  8. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v5i2.5222
  9. Hudaa, S. (2019). Transliterasi, Serapan, dan Padanan Kata: Upaya Pemutakhiran Istilah dalam Bahasa Indonesia. SeBaSa, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v2i1.1346
  10. Hudaa, S., Bahtiar, A., & Nuryani, N. (2020). Pemanfaatan Teknologi untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 9(2), 384. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v9i2.2361
  11. Meliyawati. (2023). Media Pembelajaran Bahasa. Jakarta: Deepublish Digital.
  12. Rahmat Syah, Daddy Darmawan, A. P. (2019). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Literasi Digital. AKRAB, X, 60–69.
  13. Ramadan, S. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Memahami Padanan Kata Bahasa Indonesia (Analysis of the Ability to Understand the Equivalent of Words in Indonesian Language). 12. https://doi.org/10.26499/ttbng.v10i2.504
  14. Rasyid, N., & Ramadan, S. 2022. Analysis of language errors in student thesis. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan, 21(1), 1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v21i1.2702
  15. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Setiawan, I. (2015). Equivalence Ambiguity of Foreign Words and Expression in Indonesian : a Language Political Study for General Guideline of 4th Edition. Mabasan, 9(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v9i1.156
  17. Wiyanti, E. (2016). Kemampuan Memahami Padanan Kata Bahasa Indonesia Pada Peserta Kuis Olimpiade Indonesia Cerdas Season 2 di Rajawali Televisi. Deiksis, 08(03), 247–255.
  18. Yenti, S., Susilawati, S., Mustika, I., & Siliwangi, I. (2018). Kemampuan Memahami Padanan Kata Bahasa Indonesia Di Kalangan Mahasiswa IKIP Siliwangi. Parole: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, (3), 417–424. https://dx.doi.org/10.22460/p.v1i3p%25p.747
  19. Widiawati, Y. 2022. Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) untuk Pembelajaran Berbicara Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Perguruan Tinggi: New Trend di Abad 21. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Vokasi, 1(1), 1–4. http://prosiding-old.pnj.ac.id/index.php/sniv/article/view/4549
  20. Zahra, K. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital Melalui Aplikasi Halo Bahasa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. 1(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.62083/5zfwb802

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.