Peer Review Process

To maintain the integrity, quality, and objectivity of publications in informatics and computer systems, Jurnal Jusikom adopts a Double-Blind Peer Review mechanism. Through this system, the identities of both authors and reviewers remain mutually anonymous throughout the evaluation process.

Review Workflow & Stages

1. Desk Review (Initial Screening): The Editor conducts an initial evaluation to ensure alignment with the journal's focus and scope, formatting compliance, and a similarity check via Turnitin (maximum allowance of 20%).
2. Independent Peer Review: Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to at least two expert reviewers for an independent evaluation within two to four weeks.
3. Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers' feedback, the Editorial Board determines the final status of the manuscript as follows:
   • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication.
   • Revisions Required: The manuscript requires author revisions before re-evaluation.
   • Decline: The manuscript is rejected for publication.

Evaluation Criteria

The evaluation focuses on the following key aspects:

• Novelty: Originality and significance of the research ideas.
• Methodology & Algorithms: Accuracy and appropriateness of the proposed methods or algorithms.
• Depth of Analysis: Thoroughness and validity of the result analysis.
• Currency of References: Up-to-date and relevant literature citations.