Penentuan Prioritas Utama Faktor Kecelakan Kerja dan Alternatif Pencegahannya Menggunakan Metode AHP

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 30, 2023
Download
DOWNLOAD PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Jutikomp Volume 6 Nomor 1 April 2023

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sari Maribot Tinambunan
Universitas Prima Indonesia
Irwan Budiman
Universitas Prima Indonesia

Abstract

Occupational health and safety is a set of activities to prevent injuries and health problems for workers and to provide a safe and healthy workplace. PT PLN (Persero) ULP SIbolga Kota is a sub-unit under UP3 SIbolga that helps manage customer service and distribution electricity network service. Electrical distribution work is one of the jobs that have a high risk. Some of the injuries that often occur during the distribution of electricity are electric shock, burns, and falls from a height. The purpose of this study was to determine the main priority factors causing work accidents and alternative prevention using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Data collection from expert respondents was carried out by distributing questionnaires. After analyzing the data, the consistency value (CR) of all risk criteria was determined to be less than 0.1, and this indicates that the decisions made by the experts are consistent. The main priority of the work accident factor at the criterion level is Discipline, with a weight of 0.372, the main priority of the work accident factor at the sub-criteria level is bad weather conditions, with a weight of 0.818, and the main priority of preventing work accidents in the alternative level is equipment maintenance with a weight of 0.298.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ameen, R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and wdaeighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.020
  2. Austin, L. C., Kovacs, D., Thorne, S., & Moody, J. R. K. (2020). Using grounded theory and mental modeling to understand influences on electricians’ safety decisions: Toward an integrated theory of why electricians work energized. Safety Science, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104826
  3. Aziz, S. F. A., & Osman, F. (2019). Does compulsory training improve occupational safety and health implementation? The case of Malaysian. Safety Science, 111, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.012
  4. Cąliş, S., & Buÿükakinci, B. Y. (2019). Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems Applications and A System Planning Model. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.147
  5. Chi, C. F., Yang, C. C., & Chen, Z. L. (2009). In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(4), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.12.003
  6. da Silva, S. L. C., & Amaral, F. G. (2019). Critical factors of success and barriers to the implementation of occupational health and safety management systems: A systematic review of literature. In Safety Science (Vol. 117, pp. 123–132). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.026
  7. Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., Oliveira, C. H. de, & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.11.270
  8. Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Lou, E. C. W., Wong, P. F., Wood, R., & Che-Ani, A. I. (2018). Developing weighting system for refurbishment building assessment scheme in Malaysia through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Energy Policy, 112, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.023
  9. Morgado, L., Silva, F. J. G., & Fonseca, L. M. (2019). Mapping occupational health and safety management systems in Portugal: Outlook for ISO 45001:2018 adoption. Procedia Manufacturing, 38, 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.103
  10. Rahmani, A., Khadem, M., Madreseh, E., Aghaei, H. A., Raei, M., & Karchani, M. (2013). Descriptive study of occupational accidents and their causes among electricity distribution company workers at an eight-year period in Iran. Safety and Health at Work, 4(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.07.005
  11. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  12. Unver, S., & Ergenc, I. (2021). Safety risk identification and prioritize of forest logging activities using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(1), 1591–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.012
  13. Wang, G., Dang, P., & Li, Y. (2022). Research on the evaluation system of new energy development decision in Dunhuang city based on analytic hierarchy process. Energy Reports, 8, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.119