Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) | Jurnal Keperawatan Priority

With the payment of this fee, the review, editorial decision, and author notification on this manuscript are taken place above 4 weeks. Your article will be processed in the order in which the articles enter our journal.

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee.

Please contact us if you have already made a payment.

Author Guidelines

Articles submitted to the Jurnal Keperawatan Priority meet several normative criteria as follows:
Articles use English and are sent online using the journal website. Sending articles online is subject to a fee of Rp. 500,000,- (five hundred thousand rupiah), sending, processing and publishing online.
Articles do not exceed 15 pages including images and tables contained. Article files must have the Microsoft Office extension (.doc/.docx). The article document is typed on A4 size paper (21cm x 29.7cm) using a left, top, and right bottom margin of 2.45 cm.

Article title: Font Times New Roman, size: 18, bold, and the title no more than 14 words. Written by all authors in the constributor, affiliate, and email (first author or corresponding).

Abstract: Abstract written in English. The abstract must stand alone, meaning there are no quotation marks in the abstract. The abstract must concisely provide information to the reader including introduction, research objectives, methods, results, discussion and conclusions. Abstract maximum 250 words, font: Times New Roman, size: 12, justify and single space.
Keywords: 3 - 6 keywords

Content of The Article: The main text should be typed in one column and using font: Times New Roman, size: 12, paragraphs use 1.5 spacing, alignment: justified. Articles are presented in English with 3500-7000 words including: Introduction, Method, Result, Discussion, Conclusion, and Limitation.

Introduction: What is the purpose of the study? Why are you conducting the study? The main section of an article should start with an introductory section, which provides more details about the paper’s purposes, motivation, research methods, and findings. The introduction should be relatively nontechnical, yet clear enough for an informed reader to understand the manuscript’s contribution (Font: Times New Roman, size: 12, justify and 1.5 spaces).

Methods: The methods section describes the steps followed in the execution of the study and also provides a brief justification for the research methods used (Perry et al., 2003).
The methodology section typically has the following sub-sections:
 Research design
 Participant characteristics (Eligibility and exclusion criteria)
 Sampling technique (description of the target population, research context, and units of analysis; sampling; and respondent profile)
 Data collection
 Ethical Clearance (Ethical consideration)
 Measures (Alternatively: Measurement)
Results: The results section summarizes the data collected for the study in the form of descriptive statistics and also reports the results of relevant inferential statistical analysis (e.g., hypothesis tests) conducted on the data.
Images can be presented in black and white or color, if color, they must be clearly visible. The position of the image must be proportional to the entire body of the text.
Tables can be presented in black and white or in color, if in color, they must be clearly legible. The position of the table must be proportional to the entire body of the text.
Formulas or mathematical formulas must be presented clearly using the equation menu in the word processing application, given sequential numbers and clear explanations.

Discussion
In many ways, it is the most important section in an article (Feldman, 2004). Because it is the last thing a reader sees, it can have a major impact on the reader’s perceptions of the article and the research conducted.
Different authors take different approaches when writing the discussion section. According to (Feldman, 2004; Perry et al., 2003; Summers, 2001), the discussion section should:
 Restate the study’s main purpose
 Reaffirm the importance of the study be restating its main contributions
 Summarize the results in relation to each stated research objective or hypothesis without introducing new material
 Relate the findings to the literature and the results reported by other researches
 Provide possible explanations for unexpected or non-significant findings
 Discuss the managerial implications of the study
 Highlight the main limitations of the study that could influence its internal and external validity
 Discuss insightful (i.e., non-obvious) directions or opportunities for future research on the topic
Conclusion: In this section, the author presents brief conclusions from the results of research with suggestions for advanced researchers or general readers. A conclusion may review the main points of the paper, do not replicate the abstract as the conclusion.
Limitation: It is for sure that your research will have some limitations and it is normal. However, it is critically important for you to be striving to minimize the range of scope of limitations throughout the research process. Also, you need to provide the acknowledgement of your research limitations in the conclusions chapter honestly.
References: The reference list should only contain works cited in the text. Reference format follows the rules of the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition. Wikipedia, personal blogs, or non-scientific sites are not permitted as references. Main references at least 80%. References used must be current and a maximum of 5 years old. Can use applications such as Mendeley or other reference managers to organize citations and references. The editorial board has the right to reject articles based on the reviewer's assessment and make changes deemed necessary regarding the use of language without changing the content. Substantial edits will be communicated directly to the (first) author. Make a statement letter Statement of Authenticity of Manuscripts (Author Statement)

Next information:

Email: jukep@unprimdn.ac.id

Articles

Review

Case Report