The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor for initial screening to the journal aims and scope and similarity level by using the Plagiarism Checker Engine.
These manuscripts will be sent to at least two reviewers anonymously by applying Double Blind Peer-Review.
Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses.
The decision of the revised manuscript will be then evaluated in an editorial board meeting, the final decision of whom are sent to the corresponding author.
The reviewers will review the submitted article that follow the guidelines and template of the journal provided.
The review process in this journal employs a double-blind peer-review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
In the review process, the article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers to ensure the quality of the article.
In the review process, the reviewers ensure the quality of the articles of its title, abstract, discussion and conclusion. Besides, the reviewers also address the novelty and its contribution to the scientific discussion and verify the plagiarism and ethics of publication.
The reviewer also provide feedback on whether the article is accepted, rejected or need minor or major revision.
The time required for the manuscript review process from the reviewer's response is 3-6 weeks. The decision of the Editorial Team will be sent to the scriptwriter along with the results of the review from the Bestari Reviewer / Partner.
Manuscripts that have been revised can be resubmitted a maximum of 6 weeks from the time the revision has been given and attach the results of the articles that have been corrected into the system for further review directly to the Reviewer.