Effect of Auditor Professionalism, Experience, Accountability, Competence, and Independence on Audit QualityEffect of Auditor Professionalism, Experience, Accountability, Competence, and Independence on Audit Quality
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The objective of this research is to identify the effect of Auditor Professionalism, Experience, Accountability, Competence, and Independence on Audit Quality within Public Accounting Firms (KAP) in Medan City.The study employs a quantitative approach and utilizes a sample of auditors working at KAP in Medan, selected using Nonprobability Sampling with a purposive sampling method through questionnaires.The research findings indicate that there is a partial significant effect of Professionalim, Experience, Accountability, Competence, and Independence on Audit Quality.Furthermore, simultaneously, Professionalism, Experience, Accountability, Competence, and Independence are proven to have a positive and significant effect on Audit Quality.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2020). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.
- Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65–122.
- Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 1–20.
- Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2013). Professional skepticism: The effects of a partner’s influence and the level of fraud indicators. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), 45–69.
- Coram, P., Ferguson, C., & Moroney, R. (2008). The value of internal audit in fraud detection. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(9), 813–834.
- DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127.
- DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326.
- Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152.
- Gul, F. A., Chen, G., & Tsui, J. S. (2003). Discretionary accounting accruals, managers' incentives, and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(3), 441–464.
- Haryanto, E. K., & Kurniawati, D. (2020). Auditor professionalism and independence in improving audit quality. *Journal of Accounting Science*, 6(2), 120–129. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/11374
- Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.
- Knechel, W. R., & Salterio, S. (2017). Auditing: Theory and Practice. McGraw-Hill.
- Libby, R., & Frederick, D. (1990). Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 348–367.
- Mulyani, S., & Anwar, R. (2019). The role of accountability in strengthening audit quality. *Journal of Accounting Science*, 5(1), 75–84. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/9025
- Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.
- Purnamasari, I. (2023). Professional ethics and audit quality in public accounting firms. *Journal of Accounting Science*, 9(1), 12–21. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/16588
- Sari, D. N., & Puspitasari, Y. (2021). The effect of professional skepticism and competence on audit quality. *Journal of Accounting Science*, 7(1), 56–66. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/13938
- Sirois, L.-P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). Professional skepticism and auditor cognitive load. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–23.
- Wahyuni, F. (2022). The effect of auditor experience on the quality of financial statement audits. *Journal of Accounting Science*, 8(1), 33–45. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jas/article/view/15321