The Criminalization Of Non-Consensual Deepfake Acts From The Perspective Of Positive Criminal Law And Human Rights Protection

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Anggada Perkasa

Abstract

The development of generative artificial intelligence technology has given rise to the phenomenon of deepfakes, which involve the manipulation of a person's face, voice, or body language into synthetic audiovisual content that resembles the original. When this technology is used without the consent of the manipulated subject, particularly in the form of sexually suggestive content, fraud, or defamation, serious legal issues arise because Indonesian positive criminal law does not yet have norms that specifically and comprehensively regulate such acts. This study aims to analyze the position of non-consensual deepfakes within the framework of Indonesian positive criminal law and examine the urgency of their criminalization from the perspective of human rights protection. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The research findings indicate that relevant provisions are partially covered in the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Pornography Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Sexual Violence Law, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, which came into effect on January 2, 2026, specifically Articles 172 and 407 concerning pornography and Article 492 concerning fraud. However, these provisions do not explicitly address the elements of non-consent and the synthetic nature of a person's image as separate locus delicti, so enforcement still relies on general articles not designed for AI-based crimes. From a human rights perspective, non-consensual deepfakes constitute a violation of the right to privacy, the right to honor and dignity, and have the potential to constitute a form of online gender-based violence. This research recommends the need for a specific criminal norm (lex specialis) that explicitly regulates non-consensual deepfakes, along with strengthened redress mechanisms for victims.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Perkasa, A. (2026). The Criminalization Of Non-Consensual Deepfake Acts From The Perspective Of Positive Criminal Law And Human Rights Protection. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(1), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8629

References

  1. AHL Law Office. (2026). Deepfake Fraud and Criminal Law Traps in Indonesia: A Complete Guide 2026. Retrieved from https://ahl-lawoffice.com.
  2. Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820.
  3. European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act).
  4. Hukumonline. (2024). What is Deepfake Porn and the Criminal Penalties for Perpetrators. Hukumonline Clinic. Accessed from https://www.hukumonline.com.
  5. Kopusindo Journal. Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability of Pornographic Deepfake Perpetrators. Journal of Law and Public Policy Studies. Accessed from https://jurnal.kopusindo.com.
  6. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  7. United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
  8. Republic of Indonesia. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
  9. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
  10. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 and Law Number 1 of 2024.
  11. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence.
  12. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection.
  13. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography.
  14. Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 7 of 1984 concerning Ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).
  15. SIP Law Firm. (2025). Criminal Law Enforcement of Deepfake Content. Accessed from https://siplawfirm.id.
  16. United Kingdom. Online Safety Act of 2023.
  17. United Kingdom. Sexual Offenses Act 2003 (as amended).
  18. Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. (2026). Immoral Deepfake Case, Komdigi Ready to Cut Off Access X, Unismuh Lecturer Highlights Digital Human Rights Violations. Accessed from https://hukumbisnis.unismuh.ac.id.