The Antinomy of Final Legal Decisions and Administrative Settlement of Plantations in Forest Areas: A Case Study of PT Torus Ganda

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 26, 2026
https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i2.8561
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Astri Ivo
Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University
Nila Fitri
Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the antinomy between final and binding court judgments and the settlement mechanism for plantation activities within forest areas under Articles 110A and 110B of Law Number 6 of 2023, using the PT Torus Ganda case. This normative legal study finds that the administrative mechanism may hinder the execution of court judgments and create legal uncertainty. Harmonization between judicial and administrative authority is therefore necessary to preserve legal certainty. The findings of this study indicate that final and binding court judgments must be positioned as norms that take priority in enforcement based on the principle of *res judicata pro veritate habetur*, the principle of legal certainty, and the guarantee of judicial independence as stipulated in Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Therefore, Articles 110A and 110B cannot be interpreted as a legal basis to delay, reduce, or set aside the enforcement of court judgments that have obtained final and binding legal force. Accordingly, the administrative settlement mechanism within forest areas should only be applied to business activities that have not yet become the subject of a final and binding court judgment, thereby ensuring legal certainty, the effectiveness of forestry law enforcement, and the sustainable protection of forest areas.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ivo, A., & Fitri, N. (2026). The Antinomy of Final Legal Decisions and Administrative Settlement of Plantations in Forest Areas: A Case Study of PT Torus Ganda . Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i2.8561

References

  1. Alexy, R. (2020). The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. In Oxford University Press.
  2. Azani. (2023). Pelaksanaan Putusan PN Bangkinang.
  3. Bahari, R., & Faizin, M. (2026). Deforestasi dan Krisis Ekologis Kalimantan : Dampak Regulasi Pembukaan Lahan terhadap Kesejahteraan dan Konflik Sosial Masyarakat. Custodia : Journal of Legal , Political , and Humanistic Inquiry, 1(3).
  4. Bumishambara, P., Himawan, F. D., & Arifin, F. K. (2026). Asimetri Yuridis Perhutanan Sosial : Subordinasi Kelembagaan LMDH dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. BELEID: Journal of Administrative Law and Public Policy, 4(1), 22–47.
  5. Butt, S. (2020). Indonesian Law. In Oxford University Press.
  6. FAO. (2022). The State of the World’s Forests 2022: Forest Pathways for Green Recovery and Building Inclusive, Resilient and Sustainable Economies.
  7. Hasibuan, M., Medaline, O., & Wajdi, F. (2026). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Status Lahan Koperasi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Bukit Harapan. 2122–2129.
  8. Hidayat, S. (2026). Hukum Lingkungan dalam Mengendalikan Deforetasi sebagai Ancaman Keamanan Nasional. Conflict & Security Review, 1(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.20961/csr.38
  9. Ivo, A. (2024). Pengembalian Status Dan Fungsi Kawasan Hutan Produksi Terbatas Yang Di Kuasai Perorangan Di Desa Kepau Jaya Berdasarkan UUD No 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan Undang.
  10. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Statistik Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2023. In Jakarta: KLHK.
  11. Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria. (2024). Catatan Akhir Tahun Reforma Agraria dan Konflik Agraria di Indonesia.
  12. Prabudi, W., Hindu, S., Ichsan, A. C., & Anwar, H. (2025). Pengelolaan Hutan Adat Berkelanjutan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat di Desa Sambik Elen Kabupaten Lombok Utara Sustainable Management Of Customary Forests Based On Local Wisdom In Sambik Elen Village , North Lombok Regency. Journal of Authentic Research, 4(2), 1506–1526.
  13. Rajib, R. K., Nadif, M., & Pratama, D. A. (2026). Analisis Inefektivitas Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Terhadap Deforestasi Dan Ekspansi Perkebunan Sawit Sebagai Pemicu Banjir Bandang Di Sumatra. 16(7).
  14. Tora, E. (2026). Konflik Agraria dan Ketidakpastian Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ilmiah. 3(6), 1799–1816.
  15. Widyanti, G. L. (2025). Upaya Perlindungan Deforestasi Di Papua Barat Atas Hak Tanah Ulayat Malind Dan Yei Dalam Sistem Benchmarking Eudr. Sosio Yustisia : Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial. 5(2), 248–259