The Responsibility of Digital Platforms in Fulfilling the Right to Information and Transparency in Buying and Selling Transactions on TikTok Shop in Connection with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mochamad Rivaldo Aprozi
Yuniar Rahmatiar
Muhamad Abas

Abstract

The development of TikTok Shop as a digital trading platform raises legal issues related to the fulfillment of consumer rights to information and transparency of electronic transactions. This study aims to analyze the legal regulations on the right to information and the responsibilities of digital platforms in online buying and selling transactions. The research method applied is normative juridical using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach, supported by a literature review. The findings of this study indicate that the regulation of the right to information has been accommodated as regulated in the Consumer Protection Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and the Government Regulation concerning Trading Through Electronic Systems. However, in its implementation, there is still a discrepancy between the legal provisions that are enforced and practices in the field, which is characterized by inconsistencies in product information and weak consumer protection. Digital platforms bear legal obligations. Actively ensure transparency, but their implementation has not been effective. It can be concluded, strengthening legal implementation is needed to ensure that forms of legal protection for consumers in digital-based trading systems run optimally and provide legal certainty.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Aprozi, M. R., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2026). The Responsibility of Digital Platforms in Fulfilling the Right to Information and Transparency in Buying and Selling Transactions on TikTok Shop in Connection with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i2.8485

References

  1. Book
  2. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. The Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
  3. Hadjon, Philipus M. Legal Protection for the Indonesian People. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
  4. Ibrahim, Johnny. Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research. Malang: Bayumedia, 2006.
  5. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  6. Nasution, Az. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2019.
  7. Shidarta. Indonesian Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2006.
  8. Subekti. Contract Law. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005.
  9. Legislation
  10. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.
  11. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
  12. Civil Law Act (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Article 1338 paragraph (3).
  13. Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Trade Through Electronic Systems.
  14. Journal Articles
  15. Amalia, Rizki. “Responsibilities of Electronic System Organizers in E-Commerce Transactions.” Jurnal RechtsVinding 9, no. 2 (2020): 210–212.
  16. Azhar, A., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. Legal review of the purchase of refurbished electronic goods. Karawang: Faculty of Law, Buana Perjuangan University, Karawang. (2023).
  17. Fista, Yanci Libria, et al. “Consumer Legal Protection in E-commerce Transactions Reviewed from the Perspective of UUPK.” Binamulia Hukum (2023): 7.
  18. Husni, L. “Responsibilities of Electronic System Organizers in E-Commerce Transactions.” IUS QUIA IUSTUM Law Journal 28, no. 3 (2021): 456–472.
  19. Kartini, Dwi, and Aulia Rahmawati. “The Influence of Live Streaming and Social Media Marketing on Impulse Buying in E-Commerce in Indonesia.” Journal of Economics and Digital Business 3, no. 1 (2023): 45–47.
  20. Prayuti, Yuyut, et al. “Consumer Legal Protection in E-commerce Transactions in Indonesia.” Mimbar Justitia Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2024): 2–3.
  21. Regar, Yohana Adelia, et al. “Legal Review of Consumer Rights to Product Information Transparency in Digital Transactions in Indonesia.” Lex Administratum (2025): 8–9.
  22. Rosadi, Sinta Dewi. “The Role of Digital Platforms in Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce in Indonesia.” IUS QUIA IUSTUM Law Journal 28, no. 3 (2021): 447–448.
  23. Septian, Fazrin, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. "Legal Protection for Consumers in E-Commerce Transactions via Instagram Social Media." Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, December 2023
  24. Sihombing, Rosianna Evanesa, and Made Gede Subha Karma Resen. “Consumer Protection in E-Commerce in Indonesia.” Alliance (2024): 3.
  25. Siti Nur Kholifah and Indra Yuliawan, "Consumer Legal Protection for Information Defects in E-Commerce Transactions"
  26. Matthew Tjoandra, “Legal Certainty in Resolving Sales and Purchase Disputes on E-Commerce Platforms,” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026), pp. 1581–1600,
  27. Internet
  28. “The Unprofessionalism of the TikTok Shop Team, the Unilever Indonesia Team, and the Ultrasakti Team.” Consumer Media. August 28, 2025. Accessed March 30, 2026.https://mediakonsumen.com/2025/08/28/surat-pembaca/ketidakprofesionalan-tim-tiktok-shop-tim-unilever-indonesia-dan-tim-ultrasakti
  29. “Ordered a 55-inch Coocaa TV at TikTok Shop Mall, but the return was a Panasonic TV and the return request was rejected.” Consumer Media. December 6, 2025. Accessed March 30, 2026.https://mediakonsumen.com/2025/12/06/surat-pembaca/pesan-tv-coocaa-55-inci-di-tiktok-shop-mall-yang-datang-tv-panasonic-dan-pengajuan-retur-ditolak
  30. "The Reason TikTok Shop Was Closed Revealed," detikJatim, October 5, 2023, accessed viahttps://www.detik.com/jatim/bisnis/d-6966407/terungkap-alasan-tiktok-shop-closed