Limitations On The Application Of Cross-Border Insolvency Principles In Bankruptcy Proceedings In Indonesia English Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 29, 2026
https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8318
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dania Pramesywari
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Abstract

According to Roman Tomasic, cross-border insolvency, also known as international insolvency, occurs when a debtor declared insolvent holds assets in more than one country or has creditors from other countries. The primary goal of cross-border insolvency is efficiency, so that the bankruptcy proceedings can be resolved in a single case, without having to file separate proceedings in every country where the debtor has debts or assets. This phenomenon is becoming increasingly common due to economic globalization and the rise in international trade. However, in Indonesia, regulations regarding cross-border insolvency remain limited and often pose challenges in handling cases involving foreign assets or creditors.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pramesywari, D. (2026). Limitations On The Application Of Cross-Border Insolvency Principles In Bankruptcy Proceedings In Indonesia: English. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(1), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8318

References

  1. Asian Development Bank. (2020). Strengthening insolvency frameworks in Asia and the Pacific. Manila: ADB Publications.
  2. Asnil, D. M. (2018). UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency sebagai model pengaturan kepailitan lintas batas Indonesia dalam integrasi ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 1(2), 321–334.
  3. Fitria, A. (2020). Tinjauan hukum eksekusi harta pailit debitor di luar negeri. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 17(3), 211–226.
  4. Fitriah, M. (2024). Eksekusi boedel pailit yang berada di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 1341–1348.
  5. Fletcher, I. F. (2019). Insolvency in private international law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  7. Gabriel, N. J. (2024). Proses penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Pengayoman.
  8. Halim, A. (2023). Prinsip resiprositas dalam sengketa kepailitan lintas batas negara (cross-border insolvency). Jurnal Yudisial, 17(4), 1–15.
  9. Haq, M. H. M. (2022). Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency dalam ratifikasi pengaturan hukum kepailitan lintas batas di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(2), 121–135.
  10. Hardjaloka, L. (2015). Kepailitan lintas batas: Perspektif hukum internasional dan perbandingannya dengan instrumen nasional di beberapa negara. Yuridika, 30(3), 389–410.
  11. Heriani, F. N. (2024). Urgensi implementasi Model Law UNCITRAL Cross-Border Insolvency di Indonesia. Hukumonline.
  12. Imanullah, M. N., Latifah, E., & Ratri, P. D. K. (2018). International and domestic law aspects of cross-border insolvency in order to establishing cross-border insolvency regulation in ASEAN: Indonesian perspective. Hasanuddin Law Review, 8(2), 191–205.
  13. Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131.
  14. International Monetary Fund. (2021). Resolving insolvency in emerging markets. Washington, D.C.: IMF Publications.
  15. Larose, A., Mahmudah, S., Musyafa, A. A., & Ardani, M. N. (2023). Analisis yuridis komparasi penyelesaian kepailitan transnasional di Singapura dan Malaysia dengan penyelesaian di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 6(3), 1–18.
  16. Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian hukum (edisi revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Investment climate and legal certainty in emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  18. Ratri, P. D. K., & Latifah, E. (2016). Urgensi penerapan aturan kepailitan lintas batas berdasarkan UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency di ASEAN. Jurnal Arena Hukum, 2(2), 1–15.
  19. Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Hukum kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  20. UNCITRAL. (2020). UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with guide to enactment and interpretation. Vienna: United Nations.
  21. Westbrook, J. L. (2018). A global view of cross-border insolvency systems. International Insolvency Review, 27(2), 110–126.
  22. World Bank. (2022). Doing business and insolvency resolution indicators report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.