IP Conflicts in the Music Industry: The Misuse of Sampling from a Copyright Perspective English Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Galang Farel
Meita Fadhilah

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) conflicts in the music industry, focusing on the misuse of sampling that often leads to legal disputes. Sampling, as a modern music creation technique, carries artistic value, yet its use frequently clashes with copyright protection. This study employs a normative legal method through statutory approaches and case analyses. The findings indicate that sampling without permission from the copyright holder has the potential to infringe both the moral and economic rights of the creator, thereby leading to legal consequences. These results emphasize the importance of a deeper understanding of copyright regulations among music industry actors in order to achieve a balance between creative freedom and the protection of intellectual property rights.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Farel, G., & Fadhilah, M. (2026). IP Conflicts in the Music Industry: The Misuse of Sampling from a Copyright Perspective : English. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8317

References

  1. Arewa, O. B. (2018). Copyright on Catfish Row: Musical borrowing, pastiche, and cultural identity. UC Irvine Law Review, 8(2), 421–445.
  2. Damian, E. (2002). Hukum hak cipta. Alumni.
  3. European Court of Justice. (2019). Pelham GmbH v. Hütter (Case C-476/17). Court of Justice of the European Union.
  4. Ginsburg, J. C. (2019). The concept of authorship in comparative copyright law. DePaul Law Review, 52(4), 1063–1092.
  5. Hadi Setia Tunggal. (2012). Undang-undang hak cipta terbaru. Harvarindo.
  6. Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.
  7. Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 concerning Management of Song and/or Music Royalties. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.
  8. International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. (2024). Global music report 2024. IFPI.
  9. IRAC Academy. (2021). Normative legal research methodology. IRAC Publications.
  10. Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif Republik Indonesia. (2023). Creative economy outlook 2023. Kemenparekraf.
  11. Lindsey, T. (2002). Hak kekayaan intelektual: Suatu pengantar. Alumni.
  12. Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian hukum (Revised ed.). Kencana.
  13. McLeod, K., & DiCola, P. (2019). Creative license: The law and culture of digital sampling. Duke University Press.
  14. Menell, P. S. (2018). This is the remix: Copyright and music sampling. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 41(3), 315–344.
  15. Nurdahniar Indah. (2016). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak cipta karya musik di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 46(2), 145–160.
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Digital economy outlook 2021. OECD Publishing.
  17. Rizkiyana, S. A. (2018). Perjanjian lisensi hak cipta sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum karya musik. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 7(1), 77–92.
  18. Siregar, R. (2021). Legal protection of musical works in the digital era: Indonesian copyright challenges. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 501–520.
  19. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  20. Wicaksono, A. (2023). Sampling musik dalam perspektif hukum hak cipta Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(1), 33–49.
  21. Wisén, J., & Heirbertsson, K. (2015). Music sampling and copyright challenges in the digital age. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 11(2), 88–104.
  22. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). World intellectual property report 2022. WIPO.
  23. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). World intellectual property indicators 2023. WIPO.