Consumer Rights Protection on Sugar Content Information in Ready-to-Eat Food Products: An Analysis of Consumer Protection Law and Health Government Regulation Implementation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Venia Utami Keliat
Anggada Perkasa

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases in Indonesia, particularly diabetes and obesity, correlates with excessive sugar consumption. Ready-to-eat food products often lack comprehensive sugar content information, potentially violating consumer rights. This study analyzes consumer rights protection implementation regarding sugar content information on ready-to-eat food products under Indonesian Consumer Protection Law and Health Government Regulations. This normative legal research employs statutory, case, and comparative approaches. Data were collected through literature review of primary legal sources and secondary materials, analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Significant implementation gaps exist despite comprehensive legal frameworks. Only 37% of surveyed outlets provide complete nutritional information. While Article 4(c) of Consumer Protection Law guarantees information rights and PP 28/2021 mandates nutrition labeling, enforcement remains weak. Key obstacles include regulatory inconsistencies, limited institutional capacity, high compliance costs, and low consumer literacy (42% urban, 18% rural). Substantial gaps between legal mandates and actual practice require multi-faceted solutions: regulatory harmonization, institutional strengthening, economic incentives, and massive public education campaigns.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Keliat, V. U., & Perkasa, A. (2025). Consumer Rights Protection on Sugar Content Information in Ready-to-Eat Food Products: An Analysis of Consumer Protection Law and Health Government Regulation Implementation. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 8(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v8i2.7991

References

  1. Legislation
  2. Indonesia. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. Indonesia. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1999 Number 42.
  4. Indonesia. Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2009 Number 144.
  5. Indonesia. Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2012 Number 227.
  6. Indonesia. Government Regulation Number 28 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Food Safety. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2021 Number 40.
  7. Indonesia. Minister of Health Regulation Number 30 of 2013 concerning the Inclusion of Information on Sugar, Salt, and Fat Content and Health Messages for Processed Foods and Ready-to-Eat Foods.
  8. Indonesia. Regulation of the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency Number 31 of 2018 concerning Processed Food Labels.
  9. Book
  10. Ahmadi Miru and Sutarman Yodo. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2015.
  11. Az. Nasution. Consumer Protection Law: An Introduction. Jakarta: Diadit Media, 2011.
  12. Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
  13. Janus Sidabalok. Consumer Protection Law in Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
  14. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.
  15. Shidarta. Indonesian Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2006.
  16. Journal
  17. Ares, G., et al. “Comparative Performance of Three Interpretative Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling Schemes: Insights for Policy Making.” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 68, 2018, pp. 215-225.
  18. Bleich, S.N., et al. “The Impact of Menu Labeling on Consumer Choice: Evidence from Field Experiments.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 107, no. 2, 2017, pp. 255-264.
  19. Corvalán, C., et al. “Structural Responses to the Obesity and Non-communicable Diseases Epidemic: The Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising.” Obesity Reviews, vol. 14, no. S2, 2013, pp. 79-87.
  20. Dewi, Luh Putu Suryani and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Legal Protection for Consumers Regarding Business Actors’ Obligations to Include Labels on Food Products.” Udayana Master of Law Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, 2018, pp. 396-410.
  21. Handayani, Sri and Ahmad Zaid. “Implementation of BPOM Regulations on Food Labels from a Consumer Protection Perspective.” Journal of Law and Development, vol. 49, no. 4, 2019, pp. 832-850.
  22. Kanter, R., et al. “Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling as a Policy Tool for the Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases: A Systematic Review.” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 18, 2018, pp. 3365-3374.
  23. Reyes, M., et al. “Changes in the Amount of Nutrient of Packaged Foods and Beverages after the Initial Implementation of the Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising.” PLOS Medicine, vol. 17, no. 7, 2020, e1003220.
  24. Roberto, CA, et al. “Evaluating the Impact of Menu Labeling on Food Choices and Intake.” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 100, no. 2, 2010, pp. 312-318.
  25. Sari, Kartika Mutiara, and Muhammad Adiguna. “Implementation of the Transparency Principle in the Inclusion of Nutritional Information on Food Products: A Case Study of Jakarta.” Indonesian Journal of Health Policy, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, pp. 89-104.
  26. Talati, Z., et al. “The Impact of Interpretive and Reductive Front-of-Pack Labels on Food Choice and Willingness to Pay.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 14, 2017, 171.
  27. Report
  28. Food and Drug Monitoring Agency. BPOM Performance Report 2022. Jakarta: BPOM, 2023.
  29. National Consumer Protection Agency. Annual Report on Consumer Complaints 2022. Jakarta: BPKN, 2023.
  30. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) 2018. Jakarta: Balitbangkes, 2019.
  31. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: WHO, 2015.