Criminal Liability of Online Gamblers Based on the Roles of Bookies, Operators, Affiliates, and Players

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Bara Libra Sagita
Gunardi Lie
Ade Adhari

Abstract

This study examines the criminal liability of online gambling perpetrators in Indonesia based on the roles of bookies, operators, affiliates, and players within the online gambling system. The analysis was conducted using a juridical-normative approach, examining regulations such as Article 303 of the Criminal Code and the ITE Law, as well as recent court decisions. The results show that levels of criminal liability vary based on the perpetrator's role, involvement, and intent, with bookies as the primary perpetrators bearing the heaviest responsibility. Operators and affiliates can be subject to criminal sanctions for facilitating and promoting online gambling activities. Players are subject to proportionate sanctions, taking into account aspects of awareness and socio-psychological factors such as addiction. Law enforcement faces challenges from technological developments, perpetrator anonymity, and jurisdictional boundaries, necessitating regulatory strengthening, law enforcement capacity building, cross-border cooperation, and public education. This study is limited to literature and regulatory analysis, therefore, empirical research is needed to delve deeper into socio-cultural issues and technical barriers in the field.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Sagita, B. L., Lie, G., & Adhari, A. (2026). Criminal Liability of Online Gamblers Based on the Roles of Bookies, Operators, Affiliates, and Players. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 9(1). Retrieved from https://jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id/index.php/IHP/article/view/7741

References

  1. Laras, A., Salvabillah, N., Caroline, C., Delas, J., Dinda, F., & Finanto, M. (2024). Analysis of the impact of online gambling in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Psychology.
  2. Putri, H., & Wijaya, A. (2025). Criminal liability for online gambling perpetrators. Journal of Law and Justice, 15(2), 123-140.
  3. Reandi, M. (2024). The role of affiliates in online gambling: A legal review. Journal of Digital Law, 8(1), 45-62.
  4. Sayoga, VA (2022). Criminalization of Binomo platform affiliates for online gambling. University of Surabaya Repository.
  5. Sriyana, S. (2025). The social, economic, and legal impacts of online gambling. Journal of Education and Social Affairs, 12(1), 23-34.
  6. Wahyudi, E. (2023). Legal accountability of online gambling perpetrators based on the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 45-60.
  7. Rizal, A. (2024). Understanding criminal liability in the new Criminal Code. Online Law.
  8. Sari, DN (2023). The principle of no punishment without fault in Indonesian criminal law. Journal of Law and Development, 15(2), 120-135.
  9. Handayani, S. (2024). Law enforcement against online gambling in Indonesia. National Journal of Criminalistics, 12(1), 100-115.
  10. Widodo, T. (2022). Capacity to be responsible in criminal law. Indonesian Law Journal, 8(3), 210-225.
  11. Fadlian, A. (2020). Criminal liability in a criminal act. Positum Journal, 10(1), 45-60.
  12. Firmansyah, S. (2024). Criminal liability for online gambling website creators. Journal of Law and Technology, 9(1), 112-130.
  13. Pardosi, TBWM (2022). Criminal liability for online gambling perpetrators. Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 78-96.
  14. Sitompul, FS (2023). Criminal liability for online gambling application developers. UMSU Repository.
  15. Prasetyo, A. (2025). Legal liability of electronic system operators in online gambling. Journal of Technology Law, 11(1), 50-68.
  16. Ridwan, M. (2025). Effectiveness of law enforcement against online gambling operators in the ITE Law. National Criminalistics Journal, 14(2), 80-95.
  17. Putra, D. (2024). Affiliate liability in online gambling: An Indonesian criminal law perspective. Journal of Digital Law, 7(1), 65-81.
  18. Rahman, A. (2025). The theory of participation in the criminal responsibility of online gambling affiliates. Journal of Legal Studies and Criminology, 10(2), 112-128.
  19. CRIMINAL CODE (KUHP). (nd).
  20. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. (2008). State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.
  21. Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
  22. Hukumonline. (2024). This is the text of Article 303 of the Criminal Code concerning gambling. Accessed from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/ini-bunyi-pasal-303-kuhp-tentang-perjudian-lt668f032d35f83/
  23. Kumparan. (2023). Cognitive distortion and why we are addicted to online gambling. Retrieved from https://kumparan.com/satrio-nurbantara/distorsi-kognitif-dan-mengapa-kita-kecanduan-judi-online-21Lr1V8qO8G
  24. Supreme Court Cassation Decision Number 9245 K/Pid.Sus/2025.
  25. Decision of the Padang High Court and Padang Panjang District Court, 2025.
  26. Jakarta District Court Decision, 2023.
  27. Court decision regarding online gambling promotion, 2025.